Skip to content

The Singh-Kaur debate in Sikh history (01)

May 21, 2008

Yes. I know I have been late this month in my blog postings. Wrapping up the semester the same time as conducting fieldwork for my dissertation is taking up more time than I had planned for it. However, on a positive note, I have been keeping up with my readings for my blog and have come across something which, in my opinion, can be centerpiece to the discussion on this blog.

Because female-feticide is an issue of gender discrimination, looking at female-feticide through the perspective of Sikhism will mean looking at how the issue of gender has been addressed in Sikhism. I came across some interesting work on this topic. As a point of departure, I will start with the controversy around Dr. Doris Jakobsh’s book on gender in Sikh history, devoting the next few postings on this topic.

Dr. Doris R. Jakobsh, is an asst. professor at the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. She wrote a book, “Relocating Gender in Sikh History: Transformation, Meaning and Identity,” which was based on her PhD thesis. In this work, she (re)presents Sikh history and culture through a feminist perspective.

Sikh intellectuals have criticized the book, questioning Dr. Jakobsh’s interpretation of the scriptures, the credibility of the sources of data, and the analysis of the data so obtained. [For example, this one, another, and another, …]

My entry point into this debate is Dr. Baldev Singh’s criticism of Dr. Jakobsh’s book. I will start with my reading of Chapter 11 of his work, and take it on from here, posting my notes as and when I read on this topic.

Here’s Part – 2

Here’s Part – 3

Advertisements
4 Comments leave one →
  1. June 18, 2008 11:36 pm

    Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation 🙂 Anyway … nice blog to visit.

    cheers, Diverge.

  2. Mr. Singh permalink*
    June 21, 2008 1:35 pm

    Hi Diverge,
    Perhaps you refer to the title of the posting? Intending to discuss the gender issues/debate in Sikhism, I have employed the singh-kaur label instead of male-female label in this debate.

    I will be continuing this discussion over several postings, and hopefully, the discussions to follow will make the point clearer.

    Thanks for your comment.

Trackbacks

  1. The Singh-Kaur debate in Sikh history (02) « KUDIMAARI
  2. The Singh-Kaur debate in Sikh history - 03 « KUDIMAARI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: